| 419 | 3 | 46 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
康熙朝是永定河发展的重要时期,正式确立了束水攻沙的治理方案,这是历史发展与现实需要的必然选择。对永定河的大规模治理应始于康熙三十一年。筑堤引起的一系列问题不应归罪于于成龙。康熙朝治理永定河,是根除直隶水患的一次积极尝试,也是束水攻沙思想的实践,使永定河道趋于固定,并建立了完善的管理机制,确定了河名,但也存在忽视淀泊作用、忽视黄河与永定河土性的不同、改变北京地区水文状况等不足。
Abstract：Kangxi Dynasty is an important period of development of the Yongding River. Then formally established the treatment scheme of sand flushing. This is the inevitable choice of historical development and the realistic need. The extensive management of the Yongding River should be started in the thirty- one years of Kangxi. A series of problems caused by the embankment should not blame Yu Chenglong. Kangxi management of Yongding river is the eradication of floods in Zhili a positive attempt,also is the practice of the water beam attack sand thought. It makes Yongding River becomes fixed,establish a sound management mechanism,and confirm the name of this river. However,there are also ignored the lakes,ignore the the different between Yellow River and Yongding river,change the hydrological condition in Beijing area etc.
[1]赵尔巽.清史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[2]王履泰.畿辅安澜志[M].清武英殿聚珍版丛书本.
[3]脱脱.金史[M].北京,中华书局,1975.
[4]宋濂.元史[M].北京:中华书局,1976.
[5]张廷玉.明史[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[6]大清会典则例[M].文渊阁四库全书本.
[7]清实录[M].北京:中华书局,1987.
[8]陈琮.永定河志[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1995.
[9]吴文涛.北京水利史[M].北京:人民出版社,2013年.
[10]佚名.直隶五大河流图说[M].清抄本.
[11]贺长龄.清经世文编[M].清光绪十二年思补楼重校本.
[12]杨锡绂.漕运则例纂[M].清乾隆刻本.
[13]中国第一历史档案馆.康熙起居注[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[14]李逢亨.永定河志[M].台北:文海出版社,1970.
[15]宋荦,李树德.于襄勤公(成龙)年谱[M]//沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊第三十辑.台北:文海出版社,1968.
[16]章开沅.清通鉴·圣祖仁皇帝·康熙三十七年[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2000.
[17]陈仪.陈学士文集[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[18]方苞.望溪集[M].清咸丰元年戴钧衡刻本.
[19]陶桂荣.于成龙与永定河治理.山西水利[J].2009(5).
[20]万青黎、周家楣,等.光绪顺天府志[M]//中国地方志集成·北京府县志辑.上海:上海书店出版社,2002.
[21]吴文涛.清代永定河筑堤对北京水环境的影响[J].北京社会科学.2008(1).
基本信息:
DOI：10.13790/j.cnki.issn1008-4444.2015.02.003
中图分类号:K249
引用信息:
[1]宋开金.论康熙朝永定河治理问题[J].华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版),2015,31(02):9-12+27.DOI:10.13790/j.cnki.issn1008-4444.2015.02.003.
2015-04-15
2015-04-15